.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

rachel weisz hairstyles

images Rachel Weisz Hair rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz Hairstyles
  • Rachel Weisz Hairstyles



  • nb_des
    08-04 03:00 PM
    Pardon my ignorance, how does labor substitution work and what is FIFO?
    There is no FIFO (first in first out) with respect to backlog processing . It may be LIFO.





    wallpaper Rachel Weisz Hairstyles rachel weisz hairstyles. Celebrity Hair-o-Meter:
  • Celebrity Hair-o-Meter:



  • vjkypally
    09-14 03:08 PM
    Tere Muh mein:) Ghee Shakkar:D





    rachel weisz hairstyles. rachel weisz french braid
  • rachel weisz french braid



  • go_guy123
    06-11 04:04 AM
    ratturani, i am seeing an increasing number of posts that state the facts as clearly as you have stated... thats great... now i think somewhere some day, someone will float a good idea of motivating employers such as MS, Intel, BAC etc to fight for us instead of trying to motivate only the congress... see, we dont have too much of power in congress... :-(

    The earlier people realize it the better it is. GC for non EB 1 - India is over.

    Employer will get motivated only when they feel the need. As of now they dont need EB reform as H1B is serving the purpose. Its like chasing a mirage in the desert. My friends who didnt chase GC are the ones doing professionally well. Those who have stayed on the GC boat have seen their careers stagnate and destroyed.

    However I have still seen many Indians in US oblivious or ignorant about it including my cousin.





    2011 Celebrity Hair-o-Meter: rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz hairstyle #5
  • Rachel Weisz hairstyle #5



  • ramus
    07-03 09:35 PM
    This is strickly media drive thread.. please only post related to media drive..

    Thanks..



    We should ask Congress to postpone the July 30th fee increase while it studies how USCIS can function year round with the same efficiency that it showed in the last two weeks of June.



    more...


    rachel weisz hairstyles. tattoo pictures rachel weisz
  • tattoo pictures rachel weisz



  • ash27
    03-31 11:16 PM
    Sk2006, I don't understand why would you like this thread to be deleted. I understand that this is immigration forum but I do not see any issues discussing other topics that other people are interested.... Please do not discourage people from discussing other issues that may be relevant. If you are not interested, you are more than welcome to not go through this thread....





    rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz is clearly having
  • Rachel Weisz is clearly having



  • GCDream
    07-03 08:40 PM
    Dugg 159

    http://digg.com/politics/No_July_4th_Celebrations_for_Highly_Skilled_Future _Americans/who
    Comment also added



    more...


    rachel weisz hairstyles. tattoo Weisz from
  • tattoo Weisz from



  • punjabi
    07-29 11:07 AM
    I have had 2 friends, one from my Engineering college and another who was a co-worker in SFO. The first one had joined Amway in India and the other one Quixstar in Bay Area.

    Both told me that they were brainwashed by the up-line members and they were forced to go through the cds, books, and their guidelines on regular basis. This is in their own words. I am not making it up. And both of them told me that they have lost number of friends and acquaintances since they joined Quixstar/Amway.

    May be it is a business that you can join to flourish and prosper. But I believe the operating mechanism of Quixstar is wrong. A group should be like - people should feel an urge within themselves to come and join and make the full use of it.

    Running a business itself is not bad. But when it is run and operated by covert, hidden and superficial attitude - that's when people start to feel the repulsion.

    My intention is not to attack Kushal or anybody else.


    Sure with dead bobhead braincells of yours, nobody expects your self image to be high enough. Its not for wimps wearing zippers to the side like you. If you are man enough come and talk to me, and will see who gets handcuffed.





    2010 rachel weisz french braid rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz Hair
  • Rachel Weisz Hair



  • roseball
    07-10 11:48 AM
    how long did it take you get your canadian PR adn when did u apply? please share

    I replied to your pm....



    more...


    rachel weisz hairstyles. rachel weisz hair bun
  • rachel weisz hair bun



  • meridiani.planum
    06-16 06:22 AM
    In summary, this retrogression is good in a way. The truly best and the brightest would still be employed until their turn for adjournment comes in.

    Easy for you to say when you are applying for your citizenship. You sir, are an idiot. And if you were really on H1 for as long as you claim, you are a mean idiot, no less.

    Retrogression is a scar on the face of EB immigration.

    Thats the reason every immigration bill so far related to EB has tried to resolve this issue. Anyone who says retrogression is good is either misinformed or a pychopathic specimen that needs instant mental evaluation, followed by treatment and observation in an asylum. The observation should continue for as long as it takes a typical EB3-India case to get approved. To paraphrase your quote: "The truly cured would still be observed until their turn for release comes"





    hair Rachel Weisz hairstyle #5 rachel weisz hairstyles. Long Curly Hairstyle From
  • Long Curly Hairstyle From



  • eb3India
    08-03 06:03 PM
    labor subst is good for those who can use it and of course it'z not fair for others,

    Is Immigration process is a right place to talk about fairness,

    my point is labour subst is not hurting is big time, Itz just some of us get jealouse when they see others getting ahead of the line

    IV needs to focus itz energy on much broader issues



    more...


    rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz Hairstyles
  • Rachel Weisz Hairstyles



  • grupak
    12-14 01:19 PM
    I know. I work for a prestigious law firm and I know how hard it is to become a lawyer.

    Are you a constitutional lawyer or maybe know someone who can help? Yes, we would appreciate knowledgeable input from experts.





    hot tattoo pictures rachel weisz rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz Hairstyle
  • Rachel Weisz Hairstyle



  • unitednations
    02-18 08:29 PM
    start from the bottom as that was the first e-mail. I took off identifying information and financial info. for obvious purposes:

    -------------------------------

    Dear xxxx

    Thank you very much for your quick reply. I talked to the family and advised them that the best way to proceed is you the doing the ability to pay part. They are talking to some people to get the money together. I will call them back after 4PM. Can we pay by debit card, or check or money order? Time is of the essence because of the B2 expiration on 2/11/07. I have the labor certification, (the one I printed off the website, we did not get the signed one from them yet, but it is the same). I have the 2005 tax return. I need to get the bank statements. Can I fax those to you? I also have something like a financial statement for 2006. If the numbers don't add up, you can still help us?

    Thank you so much for helping us. I know you are very busy.


    xxxx

    xxxxwrote:
    Most CPA�s don�t do audited financial statements. Reason is that there is a lot of things from a regulatory point of view that CPA�s have to keep up with in order to do audits. For this reason, most cpa�s won�t do them.

    An audit is a big thing; it is not a small thing. I wouldn�t consider this as an option for you.

    If you want me to do the ability to pay part then it will cost $xxxx.

    I will need: Copy of labor certification, 2005 federal tax returns of company. Bank statements of company for October, November and December 2006. If the numbers aren�t the way they need to be then there are still remedies.

    xxxx


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: xxx
    Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 12:34 PM
    To: xxx
    Subject: RE:

    Dear xxxxx

    First of all, thank you very much for your help. It is really appreciated. I have been researching this subject and was not able to find anything valuable until I found your name. It is really great that you are helping these people.
    I know your time is very valuable but I forgot to ask you whether or not we have to get the 2006 December bank statement certified or just send the original? If the CPA is not able to do audited financial statement for 2006 (which I doubt) are you available to do it? If we do that do we still need to send 2005 tax return? (Labor was filed on 12/26/06 and certified on 1/4/2007. )
    You are the only one who can help us with this questions. I know you are extremely busy, but I am really trying to do this right for this family. They gave up everything in Hungary, (they made like $400.00 per month and life is more expensive than here), so it would be great hardship for them to go back. As I said they don't even have an attorney here. I don't know if that matters because most of them don't know half of what you guys know.
    Anyways please, let me know how to proceed.

    Thank you very much

    xxxxx



    You have to prove ability to pay from the date that labor was filed with state department of labor. Therefore, if you sent the labor in 2001 then you have to prove ability to pay for 2001 through 2006.

    Audited financial statements are very expensive and probably do not suit your needs (At least $5,000 per year). Every year has to show ability to pay not just current year.

    I can do it but it is pretty expensive. It will range from $xxxxx. You can give me a call with the details and I�ll let you know the chances of success.




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: xxxxxx
    Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:26 PM
    To: ny.united@gmail.com
    Subject:

    Hi,

    I heard about you on one of the immigration portals. I am the employer and ready to file I-140 for alien worker. He and his wife are here on B2 visas.
    We are concerned about the ability to pay issue. I heard that you are the best on this.
    The instructions are not clear at all. Do you have to send 3 years of tax returns. 2006 is not done yet, can we send audited financial statements? What is an audited financial statement exactly? What if the company did not have enough net income in 2005 and 2004 but has it in 2006. Can you please help us? As the employer we are willing to help the worker to get the I-140 approved.

    Can you help us? Please, let me know and also how much do you charge.

    Their visa expiring soon, please respond A.S.A.P

    Thank very much
    xxxxxxxx



    more...


    house Rachel Weisz in 2007 Vanity rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz wearing a long
  • Rachel Weisz wearing a long



  • unseenguy
    06-12 01:21 AM
    If you have seen any companies misuse the H1 and L1 visa, you can complain about them. Dont go screaming around that the whole H1 and L1 program is bad. Its because of people like you that a whole group gets a bad name due to some rotten apples. Btw, all your arguments dont seem to help the IV community. Why are you even here on IV if your idealogy is not aligned with IV ? If you cant support us we dont need suggestions from a traitor like you.

    He has not learnt his lesson. Let him figure out why he was laid off thrice.





    tattoo Rachel Weisz is clearly having rachel weisz hairstyles. pictures Hairstyle Rachel
  • pictures Hairstyle Rachel



  • thepaew
    03-27 11:53 AM
    Smart Money is on Kumari Mayawati

    Boss, remove Atalji. He is on bed for last 8 months. So no chance for him.
    Sonia Gandhi is out of question as people will not accept her.
    Rahul is a baccha ( KID ) in front of all those stalwarts ( old and experience wolves ).

    Contest should be only between MMS and Advani.

    Though i would have loved to see Modi on PM HOT seat.



    more...


    pictures tattoo Weisz from rachel weisz hairstyles. of Rachel Weisz Hairstyle
  • of Rachel Weisz Hairstyle



  • apb
    12-14 02:24 PM
    I really don't see how removing the per country ceilings alone without increasing the anual quota will help the entire comminity. If you do that alone all it will do is make the date retrogressed for all the countries even further. So where's the gain?
    Getting the anual quota increased, not counting dependents in the quota and recapturing visas from passed years will help EVERYBODY.

    If people want to think that something petty as removing the per country quota is going to solve all our problms then all the best (and God bless us all) ! :cool:

    PS - Pardon me if this sounds harsh but this is how I see it.

    We need to understand that the basic premise of the removing the per country limit uses the assumption that there is enough visa for all of us. But sadly this is not true. We have ask for increasing the GC limit from 140000 to xyz. The last increase was in 1990 which was after 14 years. Now 18 years have passed and there is no change in that direction.

    Increasing limit cannot be fought in the court. It requires changes in law. Removing dependents from EB based GC consumption also cannot be decided in court. But removing per country limit for EB/GC can be decided in court. Just because we are fighting for one does not mean we are ignoring other agendas of IV.





    dresses Rachel Weisz Hairstyle rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz#39;s Half up Half
  • Rachel Weisz#39;s Half up Half



  • BharatPremi
    12-14 12:51 PM
    If they change the current law to favor Indians, then it will be disciminatory to other nationals. Think the other way..

    You may be almost 100% right and everybody is trying to take the sense out of this. Lazy*and Mark almost have given the proof that "We can't do this"..

    Good, we will not have a problem if we get assured about this 100%.

    But one thing I do not understand is your interpretation (in quots)... If at all anything we are asking is what "Remove Per Country based ceilings" but how can somebody with high skill translate that into what you quoted?

    If that happens, Indians will be benefited , yes that is not a favor, and if at all for the sake of argument even if we "tag" the word "favored"...Chinese,Mexicans,Philipinos will also be "favored".. So if they remove this ceiling then in reality it would be a "Equal ground for every national" And in that nobody can argue that "It is discriminatory to other nationals".



    more...


    makeup rachel weisz hair bun rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz in 2007 Vanity
  • Rachel Weisz in 2007 Vanity



  • sivasiva
    03-26 10:06 AM
    gururs,

    Is it possible to substitute labor as future employee?

    Thanks





    girlfriend pictures Hairstyle Rachel rachel weisz hairstyles. We often see Rachel Weisz on
  • We often see Rachel Weisz on



  • boston_gc
    06-27 09:44 AM
    I also checked with my lawyer and made fool out of myself. Please, please please stop discussing this and concetrate on the real stuff.....

    Better than this discussion, we should put our energies on the new CIR bill and see if and how can we benefit from that.





    hairstyles Rachel Weisz Hairstyles rachel weisz hairstyles. Rachel Weisz Short Hairstyle
  • Rachel Weisz Short Hairstyle



  • raveen
    08-02 06:02 PM
    Hello sir, I am on H1B, a new company is hiring me and they have little knowledge about h1b issues, my h1b transfer is not filed yet, they are 100% sure that they r gonna hire me, but I haven't decided whther to work with them or not, the other day I went to their office to fillout the application for background check but they made me fill out all the forms that a candidate has to fill during the hiring process, they went ahead and filled my I-9 and w-4 forms too. I was thinking that it's all a process of pre-hiring,but after coming home I did a little research and found out that I-9 has to be filled after they transfer my h1b, do you think is it gonna be a problem?I e-mailed them not to put me in the system, did I violate any law by getting hired by them before even my visa transfer process is started?ofcourse I didn't start my work and I am not going to start until my visa tranfer is done. The employment is at will and I didn't sign any contract with them, do you think they will create any problems for me in future(if they want to)?b'cos I haven't decided to work wth them yet and I may tell them that I am not gonna join them. Please advice me I am really tensed.
    Thanks in advance





    pmb76
    04-01 03:33 PM
    The BJP is the only party that can lead India in a sane manner. The various issues that stand before India :
    - Free market reform that has been strangled by the communists and congress
    - National security . For the congress and other so called secular forces - criticizing terrorism/pakistan is tantamount to criticizing Islam. They jail Varun Gandhi for making divisive comments(agreed that the comments are in bad taste) but what about the Imam Bukharis and Mulayam singhs who make divisive comments every single day.
    - The concept of nationalism and pride was first felt during the years when Vajpayee was PM. To be honest I never felt proud to be Indian until AB Vajpayee became PM
    - Infrastructure development. The BJP is more free market than any other party. the Vajpayee administration started so many infrastructure schemes like the golden quadrilateral national highway and various others.
    - The BJP is the only party with true nationalists. You may blame them for being right wing hindus but they have more secular credentials than the congress or other so called secular forces. Now let's get this straight - Radical Islam is the biggest threat to world peace and the BJP is the only party at the national level that recognizes this threat.

    Agreed that there could be corruption in the BJP/NDA as well but atleast you know what you are getting into. Manmohan Singh is the weakest PM India has ever had whose sole goal in life is to please his masters - the Gandhi family.
    All in all you will find faults with everyone - you have to back the least of all evils.





    Pineapple
    12-14 02:16 PM
    I agree with alterego.

    There is another compelling argument against taking the lawsuit way, even if assuming there is a case to be made, and we have plenty of money. (The first is unclear, the second is a firm no, but let us assume anyway for the sake or argument)

    One of the reasons why Roe v Wade, 34 years on, is still a controversial decision today is the fact that the US is probably unique in the world in the sense that a constitutionality argument was used to decide public policy.
    In Europe, as in other parts of the world, abortion was considered as a health issue, and handled via legislation and health care guidelines.
    But because it was a constitutionality issue in US, and enforced from the bench, a significant portion of the populace felt left out of the decision making process, which stimulated a simmering opposition and entrenched the main actors of the "culture wars", which persist to this day.
    There is significant debate even among liberals whether Roe V Wade has helped or harmed the liberal cause, and if knowing what we know, there could have been another approach to achieve the same end.

    In a nutshell, approaching the courts is a double edged sword. There may be some strategic gains in the short term, but the long term impact is unclear and unpredictable. A legislative approach might be slower and incremental, but it is less risky.

    Think of lobbying as polite negotiation.
    Think of Supreme court case as picking a fist fight, in which we are badly out numbered.
    Once you have started a fist fight it is much harder to negotiate, especially from a loosing position.



    This is exactly correct. It is not the question of right or wrong here. That is what gets folks so upset on this thread, they feel since their viewpoint s right then.......... Most neutral observers like mbartosik can see this as unjust and there may be many in the US as well, however certainly not the majority. However, there are many ways in which this could backfire. One example is the recently seen debate over illegal immigration and the turn in public sentiment. Truth be told, if someone did something wrong 12 yrs ago(crossed the fence), now is married to a US citizen and has 3 US children, what do you do with them? What about the 3yr old who was brought to the USA by their parents and knows no other system? Perhaps a few years ago joe public would have given them a pass, no more, the debate has become so nasty that positions have been hardened to the point that reason does not prevail. Another reason has something to do with the perceived sense of entitlement Americans sensed in the illegal immigrant community(of course fanned by Lou Dobbs and his ilk). These are complex issues and generally you will get a lot further appealing to someones sense of fairness than explaining how you are entitled to something and will take it from them if it is not given to you.



    Total Pageviews